FLOW vs AWARD-7 vs LEADER Renal Substudy: GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Kidney Outcomes Compared
At a glance
- FLOW design / Kidney composite as the primary endpoint; placebo-controlled [1]
- Enrollment / 3,533 adults; 1,767 semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly, 1,766 placebo [1]
- Primary result / 331 vs 410 first events; HR 0.76 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.88); P=0.0003 [1]
- Kidney-specific components / HR 0.79 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.94) [1]
- eGFR slope / Less steep by 1.16 mL/min/1.73 m² per year with semaglutide (P<0.001) [1]
- All-cause death / 20% lower; HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01) [1]
- FDA label / Ozempic is indicated for kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes with CKD [2]
What did FLOW test?
FLOW randomized adults with type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease to subcutaneous semaglutide 1.0 mg weekly or placebo [1]. Entry required albuminuria on one of two strata: eGFR 50 to 75 mL/min/1.73 m² with a urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio above 300 and below 5,000 mg/g, or eGFR 25 to below 50 mL/min/1.73 m² with a ratio above 100 and below 5,000 mg/g [1]. The primary outcome was a composite of kidney failure (dialysis, transplant, or eGFR under 15 mL/min/1.73 m²), at least a 50% reduction in eGFR from baseline, or death from kidney-related or cardiovascular causes [1].
How large was the kidney benefit?
Median follow-up was 3.4 years, with 1,767 people on semaglutide and 1,766 on placebo [1]. The primary outcome occurred as a first event in 331 people on semaglutide and 410 on placebo, a 24% lower risk (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.88; P=0.0003) [1]. The kidney-only components moved the same way (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.94), and the mean annual eGFR slope was less steep by 1.16 mL/min/1.73 m² per year (P<0.001) [1].
Death from any cause was a confirmatory secondary outcome and was 20% lower with semaglutide (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.95; P=0.01) [1]. Cardiovascular death was also lower, with an HR of 0.71 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.89) [1]. Early trial cessation was recommended at a prespecified interim analysis [1].
Why the three drugs cannot be ranked
FLOW's 24% belongs to a composite that includes cardiovascular death, in adults with diabetes and albuminuric CKD, against placebo [1]. Semaglutide and dulaglutide were compared head to head in SUSTAIN 7, but that trial's primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c, not a kidney outcome [4]. We found no kidney-outcome results for dulaglutide or liraglutide to set beside FLOW.
What the labels say
Ozempic, the semaglutide product labeled for type 2 diabetes, carries an indication for kidney outcomes in type 2 diabetes with chronic kidney disease [2]. Wegovy is the weight-management semaglutide product, labeled for weight reduction, cardiovascular risk reduction and MASH [3].
The Wegovy label warns about acute kidney injury due to volume depletion and calls for renal-function monitoring when adverse reactions could cause volume depletion [3].
Frequently asked questions
What was the main kidney result in FLOW?
Who does the FLOW result apply to?
Did FLOW show a mortality benefit?
References
- Perkovic V, Tuttle KR, Rossing P, Mahaffey KW, Mann JFE, Bakris G, et al. Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(2):109-121. Effects of Semaglutide on Chronic Kidney Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes
- U.S. National Library of Medicine, DailyMed. Ozempic injection prescribing information. Ozempic injection label
- U.S. National Library of Medicine, DailyMed. Wegovy injection and tablets prescribing information. Wegovy injection and tablets label
- Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, Lüdemann J, Andreassen C, Navarria A, et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(4):275-286. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial